12 November 2008

Airport improvement. Evil, or is there actually a reason behind it?

"Not In My Backyard!" is the mantra of people who refuse to have something bigger than them displace them or affect them in any matter (even in a positive way, which they tend to blind themselves from). In some circumstances, I wholeheartedly agree with their stance. I wouldn't want sexual predators living near me or my neighbors. Nor would I want railroad tracks be set near my house (if my house was there before, then they can find somewhere else to lay tracks).

But there are some things that people tend to rally against. One such thing is the local airport.

I have seen people start rallies to close the local airport down (if you're in Chicago, don't worry. Mayor Richard Daley is WAY ahead of you in that department! I think you should worry about STOPPING him). People say that airports bring a lot of noise, and a lot of pollution. People say that houses near airports lose value because of the noise, and that it shouldn't be that way.

But lets go back to the beginning of the problem. Why live near an airport?

In spite of my disdain for the region I live in, I am happy that I live close to an airport. For me, it's comforting to hear a whirling propeller overhead. In fact, if I hear a propeller that sounds different (say, a different engine tone, or a different prop RPM), I'll run to the window, waiting to see if it's something special, like some sort of aerobatic or experimental airplane, or a classic Stearman biplane, or an older model twin.

But I digress.

Here's the issue. People nowadays tend to be myopic. They see what is only in front of them, and whatever comes into view unexpectedly will startle them and anger them, like a little dog seeing a bird fly from the bush he's sniffing. "Out of my tree!" he barks, then goes back to sniffing. "Not in my backyard" the neighbor cries, and then goes back to his business.

Those people are like those working to shut down Santa Monica Airport. A group of myopic individuals who seek only their personal gain, rather than the gain of the community. The airport neighbors that are noisier than the aircraft causing all the "noise".

People tend to forget all the gains that are made in aviation each day. Technology is getting better in aircraft and engine design to reduce pollution (noise and carbon) and more importantly, increase safety. Pilot training is at its best, and continues to improve. And the ancillary costs to run an aviation operation, such as a flight school, or a fixed-base operator, or an airline serving the community, and all the infrastructure that must be built and maintained brings jobs to the community. People should be thankful that they have an airport near them.

These people forget that airports bring important jobs, especially nowadays in this economy. Airports bring money, BIG money into the community! They're not there to cause a big raucous above your house. They're here for a reason, be it to train, or to work, or to sign a deal with a local business. Airports really ARE your friends.

Of course, why did you move under the approach path of a runway? You didn't see those planes flying over you?

Reminds me about work one day. One customer at the baggage office went to complain that his wine bottles in a poorly packed bag broke, and wanted the airline to pay for it. After being asked why he packed the bottles in that manner, he said "so if they break, the airline could pay for it". Like him, complainers of airport proximity, and the non-aviation-savvy general public as a whole, share the same logic. "I'm going to buy this house. And I'll get that airport to go away after I move in. That'll increase the value of my house!" Sorry, the airport was there before you were. The airport has the right to stay and if necessary, expand if the need arises.

Today, in West Palm Beach, Florida, the county held a "public workshop" regarding the FAA's findings on extending or moving a runway at Palm Beach International. More of which can be read here (please advise via email if the link is dead).

West Palm Beach mayor Lois Frankel believes that traffic is decreasing at Palm Beach International. She believes there is no purpose in extending the runway. She feels that because of the rising cost of fuel and air travel, as well as the current economic state has decreased traffic, apparently so much so that it will effectively kill any justification for extending a runway (I'm guessing she doesn't want the hassle of complainers of airport proximity calling her office since her hands would be effectively be tied regarding the situation).

The FAA believes, however, that an alternative would be to build a new airport, a "green airport" (an airport build out of green space, like a large empty field, like Denver International Airport, though nowadays, "green" will also refer to reducing carbon footprints, and conserving energy, and all that jazz). I'm for that as well. However, people need to realize that there is a huge need for airports in a National Airspace System that is becoming saturated.

The solution is to build more runways. Not user-fees, not auctioning landing and departure slots to the highest bidder, but adding runways to add the capacity for more traffic.

There are many other solutions, but limiting airports to a level that is not near their greatest potential, or closing airports for the gain of only a small group of people. For the convenience and "peace" of a few hundred people at the departure and arrival ends of an airport that has closed, would it really be worth losing literally thousands of jobs from outlying communities? Or what about losing all of that influx of money from those noisy "big wigs" in their corporate jets going to YOUR area to make big business deals that would benefit your community? Think about why they are in your community. It's your airport!

That's why I urge my readers to visit http://www.aopa.org/asn/ to see AOPA's efforts in supporting your local airports. Airports of all sizes need protection. Though some airports are thriving with the support of their communities, there are others that are not as fortunate. Airports like Santa Monica Airport, are in danger of having their operations severely limited, if not closed altogether.

Just as how it's my airport, it's there for YOUR use as well. Just as how it's my airport, it's also your interest to be protected!

Some airport authorities are providing free soundproofing to homes that are affected by airport noise. If you are that irritated by airport noise (or porbably more accurately, that stubborn to move), give your local airport authority a call. For example, as a good gesture, Los Angeles World Airports is offering free home soundproofing to airport neighbors of LA International, LA/Van Nuys, LA/Palmdale, and LA/Ontario airports. The City of Los Angeles is offering this service to its citizens (I keep stressing this, because airport neighbor/NIMBYs have lashed out at this gesture of good will towards them). Rather than fight the airport, you should help your airport improve. Be a good citizen and work hand in hand with your local airport authority.

I am willing to do whatever aviation asks of me (my personal mantra, similar to John F. Kennedy's quote, is "Ask not what aviation can do for you, but what you can do for aviation!"). People, we have taken so much for granted in aviation. And we have even dared to impose our wants on aviation. It's high time we return the gracious favor that aviation has given us. Work with local pilots at airport open houses. Work in conjunction, rather than fight against, your local airport authority. A symbiotic relationship between the airport and its neighbors is not only possible, but is happening now!

Airports like Palm Beach County Park Airport (Gassaway Field, previously known as Lantana), have such a relationship. It's not perfect, but both the airport neighbors (of which I am one) and the airport live peacefully in coexistence. The airport neighbors do not list the airport as one of the worries of the neighborhood. And, people, that's what it's all about! Though it isn't ideal (the airport has not held any type of large-scale open-house event, no less an airshow, where a large volume of volunteer work exists), it's getting there. There should be more public awareness of aviation. Just like our roads, airports are there to serve ALL of us. Airports are probably the most important neighbor we will have.

No comments: